Effect of cement color and tooth-shaded background on the final color of lithium disilicate and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics: An in vitro study


YILDIRIM B., Recen D., TEKELİ ŞİMŞEK A.

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, cilt.33, sa.2, ss.380-386, 2021 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 33 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/jerd.12611
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.380-386
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: cement color, lithium disilicate ceramic, translucency, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic
  • Uşak Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: To evaluate the translucency and effects of different cement colors on the final shade of lithium disilicate ceramics (LDS) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics (ZLS) over an A1 and A3 tooth-shaded background. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight rectangular-shaped specimens were sliced from LDS and ZLS blocks. The final thickness of the specimens was set at 0.8 ± 0.01 mm. Spectrophotometric measurements for the translucency were taken against black and white backgrounds. Composite resin tooth-shaded background disks were fabricated in two shades (A1 and A3), as were resin cement disks (opaque and translucent) (n = 11). Next, the ceramic specimens and tooth-shaded backgrounds were connected with glycerin, and baseline measurements were taken. These measurements were used as a reference. Then, the ceramic specimens, cement specimens, and tooth-shaded backgrounds were connected together with glycerin, and a second set of measurements was taken. The CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) color formula was used to calculate the translucency and color differences. A Mann-Whitney U test was also performed for the translucency, and a three-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) test was performed for the ΔE00 values (α =.05). Results: The LDS and ZLS groups had similar translucency (P =.055). The ΔE00 values of the specimens were significantly affected by the cement color and tooth-shaded backgrounds in the LDS and ZLS groups (P <.05). Using the opaque cement color resulted in statistically significant differences against the light and dark (A1 and A3) tooth-shaded backgrounds in both the LDS and ZLS groups (P =.022 and P =.006). Conclusions: The material type did not affect the translucency or final color. However, the cement color did affect the final shade when thin ceramic restorations were used. Clinical Significance: It should be noted that the cement color and tooth-shaded background used may change the final color of thin high translucency ceramic restorations that contain lithium disilicate and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate.