IDENTIFYING THE FACTORS INFLUENCING MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ GRADING PRACTICES REGARDING STUDENTS’ IN-CLASS PERFORMANCE: A RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY STUDY


Creative Commons License

BİRGİN O., Yılmaz M.

Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, cilt.16, sa.3, ss.196-207, 2023 (ESCI) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 16 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.7160/eriesj.2023.160304
  • Dergi Adı: Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, IBZ Online, EBSCO Education Source, ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.196-207
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Grading, mathematics, participation in classroom activities, performance assessment, scale development
  • Uşak Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

This study aims to develop a scale to identify the factors influencing mathematics teachers’ grading practices regarding students’ in-class performance. The study was carried out with 180 secondary and 140 high school mathematics teachers from the southwestern region of Türkiye. The scale’s construct validity was determined using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA results showed that the scale consisted of a 5-point Likert-type scale with 36 items under eight factors (mathematical knowledge and skills, social behaviors, affective skills, effort, homework performance, follow-up test results, academic exam results, and external benchmarks). The scale explained 70.02% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.50 to 0.92. The item-total correlations ranged from 0.36 to 0.64, and t-test results for the item discrimination index were significant. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the overall scale was calculated to be 0.92. The CFA results indicated that the scale model had a good fit (Chi-square/ df = 1.39; RMSEA = 0.051; IFI = 0.98; NNFI = 0.97; CFI= 0.98; and SRMR = 0.062). Based on the findings, the scale is a valid and reliable instrument that may be used in determining the factors influencing mathematics teachers’ grading practices.