The predictive value of electrocardiographic polarization parameters on appropriate ICD shock in primary prevention heart failure patients


Ozgul U., TURAN O. E., Baskurt A. A., YILANCIOĞLU R. Y., Dogdus M., Inevi U. D., ...Daha Fazla

Journal of Electrocardiology, cilt.77, ss.80-84, 2023 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 77
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.10.008
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Electrocardiology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.80-84
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Appropriate ICD shock, Frontal QRS-T angel, Primary prevention, Tp-e intervention, Tp-e/QT ratio
  • Uşak Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Object: The effect of frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio on cardiac events have been shown in many studies. In this study, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle, TPe and Tp-e/QT ratio on ICD shock in patients who had ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) implanted due to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Material and method: 158 patients with HFrEF who had previous ICD implantation were retrospectively analyzed. 27 patients were found to have an appropriate shock. Frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio were calculated by evaluating the basal ECG records of the patients. Comparisons of these arrhythmogenic predictors were made in patients with and without ICD shock at follow-up. Result: When 158 patients with previous ICD implantation were analyzed in two groups with and without ICD shock, the number of patients with frontal QRS-T angle >120°, Tp-e interval > 105 ms, Tp-e/QT > 0.2 in the shock group (n: 27) was found to be high with a different significance (p:<0.01, p:<0.01, p:<0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding other ECG parameters such as QRS duration, QT interval, PR interval, fragmented QRS and positive T wave. In addition, more amiodarone use was observed in the shock group, and more hyperlipidemia cases were observed in the non-shocked group (p:0.01; p:<0.01). Conclusion: Increased frontal QRS-T angle, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QT ratio are arrhythmogenic parameters and predict appropriate ICD shock.