Comparison of endocervical curettage and endocervical brush during unsatisfactory colposcopy for endocervical sampling in human papillomaviruses positive women


Creative Commons License

ŞENYUVA İ., KÜÇÜK S.

Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online), vol.54, no.2, pp.75-79, 2023 (Peer-Reviewed Journal) identifier

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of endocervical curettage (ECC) and endocervical brush (ECB) in women with human papillomaviruses (HPV) positive who had unsatisfactory colposcopy for endocervical sampling. Material and Methods: Women who underwent ECC and ECB during an unsatis- factory colposcopy were retrospectively investigated. The results were classified as normal, inadequate, low, and high-grade lesions for compiling the two methods. Results: In the 44 cases, the mean age was 45.75±9.71; seven of the 44 cases were low-risk HPV, while 37 were high-risk HPV. Normal results were reported in 19.4% of ECB and 32.8% of ECC (p>0.05). Unsatisfactory results were observed in 56.3% of ECB and 37.5% of ECC (p>0.05). Low-grade epithelial abnormalities were detected more in the ECB (p=0.001). ECB was not superior to ECC in high-grade lesion detec- tion (p>0.05). Conclusion: Low-grade lesions were diagnosed with ECB, while high-grade lesions were detected with ECC. ECB is a simple and less painful technique and can be used during unsatisfactory colposcopy in low-grade lesions, but more studies are needed.