Guler, T. E. Et Al. 2017. Combined Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. American Journal of the Medical Sciences , vol.354, no.6 , 586-596.

Guler, T. E., Aksu, T., YALIN, K., Golcuk, S. E., Mutluer, F. O., & Bozyel, S., (2017). Combined Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. American Journal of the Medical Sciences , vol.354, no.6, 586-596.

Guler, Tümer Et Al. "Combined Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation," American Journal of the Medical Sciences , vol.354, no.6, 586-596, 2017

Guler, Tümer E. Et Al. "Combined Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation." American Journal of the Medical Sciences , vol.354, no.6, pp.586-596, 2017

Guler, T. E. Et Al. (2017) . "Combined Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation." American Journal of the Medical Sciences , vol.354, no.6, pp.586-596.

@article{article, author={Tümer Erdem Guler Et Al. }, title={Combined Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation}, journal={American Journal of the Medical Sciences}, year=2017, pages={586-596} }